| Charles Darwin saw natural selection, not sexual selection
|
| But natural selection as the most serious cause of evolution
|
| But what was going on with bird songs and peacocks?
|
| They follow mysterious laws — but then Darwin had a curious thought
|
| It probably occurred to him while he was trying to explain his theory
|
| To a young Victorian blond, whose face displayed
|
| A mixture of desire and feverish awe
|
| The immediate cause of which Darwin clearly saw… yee-ah
|
| So he said: «My dear, descent with modification comes from
|
| The struggle for survival and reproduction
|
| Hence, the reason for some structures must be seduction… wassup!
|
| In fact, Darwin’s brain was probably one such structure
|
| Just as peacocks' tails show off the genes of the top males
|
| And likewise the songs of nightingales, the fighting skills of elephant seals
|
| And minnows with colourful scales, see these are all traits that sexual
|
| selection
|
| Has shaped through the female preference to get with the fittest mates
|
| But in the case of human brains that selective pressure goes both ways |
| Male to female and female to male
|
| Pretty much anything in nature that’s just for display, just for showing off
|
| And isn’t meant dissuade or chase predators away, like camoflauge
|
| Must have been selected for in a sexual way, anything in nature
|
| That’s just for display and has no survival value… but wait
|
| Doesn’t that mean this is just such a display?
|
| Right now, at this very moment… no way, it’s a mistake
|
| I swear, I really did come here with something to say
|
| But, they’re telling me it’s just a demonstration of my DNA?
|
| And so what if it is? |
| That’s great, what’s to explain?
|
| Okay, maybe a couple of things. |
| First, when I say that something ornate
|
| Like language, originally evolved as a seductive display
|
| I am not arguing that people only use it just to get laid
|
| Darwin leaves Freud in the dustbin, okay?
|
| Something that evolved for one purpose can be used for a different purpose today
|
| For instance, I could use a urine stream to put out a fire
|
| But that doesn’t mean the penis evolved as bush fire fighter |
| This is a theory of language function, a theory of where it comes from;
|
| What it’s used for now, well that is a separate discussion;
|
| So which was it? |
| Was complex language originally a mechanism
|
| For survival or reproduction? |
| It must have been one of them
|
| I’m talking about complex language now, not simple language
|
| Like «Ooh look, snake, don’t step!» |
| Think about it
|
| How would complex language possible help you survive in the stone age?
|
| Can you talk a predator out of attacking?
|
| Can you talk a parasite out of infecting?
|
| Can you talk a potential mate in to consenting?
|
| Potentially, right? |
| Not necessarily, but potentially
|
| Hence, presenting the grand unified theory of rhyme
|
| Where does rhyme come from? |
| I’m talkin' about Homer, Beowulf
|
| Chaucer, Shakespeare, Alexander Pope, Eminem, and Jay-Z, it’s all the same
|
| The mating mind uses lyrical signs, combined with wit and wordplay
|
| Conversation, humour and different narrative styles
|
| To appraise the fitness of mates, both for the purpose of marriage ties
|
| And for mates of the more temporary kind |
| These are the humble roots of the literary sublime
|
| We are all Shakespearean primates verbalizing our cherry behinds
|
| But how could we possibly test this bizarre theory of mine?
|
| Not just mine, also Geoffrey Miller’s
|
| Ideally, we could use experimental holding zoos
|
| Filled with human subjects, we could feed them some booze
|
| And with an overhead view we could observe which breeding pairs reproduce
|
| And how often they use their verbal ornaments to seduce
|
| We could even separate them into control groups, to see whether male
|
| Or female vocals are more prone to be used in the stimulation of hormones
|
| Although, it’s true that this sort of experiment, on humans
|
| Isn’t normally approved — outside of nightclubs
|
| If only there existed in a state of nature some cultural group we could study
|
| That was preoccupied with makin' paper, and parading
|
| Half-naked women shakin' their money makers in front of competitive males
|
| Displaying mating behaviour while trading their creativity for sexual favours
|
| If such a group existed, I predict it would be a major player |
| In the entertainment industry, and would be in major danger
|
| Of being overwhelmed by angry player haters
|
| But I may have to save some of my research for later
|
| And how do I answer the charge that I’m participating
|
| In this mating dance myself with these dazzling bars? |
| That isn’t hard
|
| I plead guilty — I worked hard to achieve this ability
|
| And if it also gives my genes visibility for females
|
| Then I say «so be it» — But, I confess, if you look close
|
| It also reveals my unique disability
|
| See, my tendency to tell these monkey fables and funny medieval tales
|
| It generally fails to attract any nubile young females
|
| It does attract women a lot though — all highly educated
|
| And post-menopausal! |
| I know, isn’t it awful? |
| I get mobbed after my shows
|
| By hoards of groupie grandmas who thank me for making it possible
|
| For them to appreciate a hip-hop flow
|
| And, you might ask, where are their granddaughters?
|
| My guess is, they’re all at gangster rap concerts
|
| But hey, that’s how sexual selection works
|
| Any mutation, such as myself, gets tested first |
| And if it doesn’t get spread, well, then it gets purged
|
| So this experimental hip-hop mix where it gets crossed
|
| With classic scientific works and literature and lectures
|
| Will probably get the burial that it deserves
|
| That is, unless you spread it, like whispers
|
| So tell your friends about me, huh? |
| Find me some new listeners
|
| Or write about me online, let the gossip disperse
|
| So that even if I die, my name survives in the Twitterverse |