| Another way of talking about the web
|
| Is that there are different levels of magnification
|
| For example, supposing you take a piece of embroidery
|
| And here it is, obviously, in front of you; |
| an ordered and beautiful object
|
| And then you take out a microscope, and you look at the individual threads
|
| At a certain point, as you turn up the microscope, you’ll get a hopeless tangle
|
| Which doesn’t make any sense at all
|
| The wrapped fiber that constitutes the thread is a mess
|
| Hasn’t been organized, nobody did anything about it. |
| But at the level of
|
| magnification at which you actually see it with the naked eye, it’s all been
|
| organized
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| Alright, now keep turning up that microscope
|
| Take one of those individual threads in the fiber that seems to be so chaotic,
|
| and go into the constitution of that
|
| And again, you’ll find fantastic order
|
| You’ll find the most gorgeous designs of molecules
|
| Then, keep turning it up
|
| And again, at a certain level you’ll find chaos again
|
| Alright, keep going
|
| And at another level you’ll find there’s marvelous order
|
| Now, you see, order and randomness constitute — in other words, the warp and
|
| the woof
|
| Where everything is in order, everything’s under control; |
| in randomness,
|
| it’s all
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| But we wouldn’t know what order was
|
| Unless we had messes
|
| It’s the contrast of order and messes that order itself depends upon
|
| And so in exactly the same way, it is the contrast of on and off,
|
| there and not there — in other words, life and death, being and non-being —
|
| that constitutes existence
|
| Only, we pretend that the random side of things, the disorderly side of things,
|
| could possibly win in the game of competition or I would rather call it
|
| collaboration between the two
|
| When you lose sight of the fact that the order-principle and the
|
| random-principle go together
|
| That’s exactly the same predicament as losing sight of the fact that all
|
| individually delineated things and beings
|
| Are connected underneath
|
| You know, just like mountains stick out of the Earth and there’s a fundamental
|
| Earth underneath them, so all of us, as different things, we stick out of
|
| reality
|
| And there’s a continuity underneath but you ignore that, you see?
|
| That’s the thing that’s left out
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| It’s all been organized
|
| But it’s a mess
|
| See? |
| I’m just giving you many examples of the same principle |